Bingo Test

Bingo News

14 Dec 2011

GA Minutes – 7pm Tuesday 13th December 2011


GA Minutes – 7pm Tuesday 13th December 2011

Minutes Tuesday 13th December 2011
Location: Tent City University
Event: Evening General Assembly of Occupy London
Date: Tuesday 13th December 2011
Facilitator: Saskia
Minutes: John
Weather: Cold winds, after the storm.
Started 7.16
Facilitator: Explains consensus and hand signals…
We have a little group to sing, please listen beautifully.
[insert group and song name]
Music plays…
[applause]
Facilitator: Thank you. We will start with a positive announcement.
Multi-faith group: Invite everybody to hear Rev Jesse Jackson, veteran of American civil rights movement, speak at Thursday 3pm in front of St Paul’s steps. If the weather is bad it will be in Tent City University.
Facilitator: Are there any more announcements?
Announcement: 8 million people killed by dictator in Congo. Tomorrow at 12 o’clock in front of congress embassy there is a demonstration. Gather here at 11am if you want to go and support.
Announcement: This weekend Edinburgh will be hosting second UK-Ireland Occupy meeting.
Facilitator: Discussion will be about aims, but before we will hear about an incident yesterday.
Contribution: It is everybody’s individual choice to call the police if they have been threatened or attacked.
I did not get involved to report people to the police. But when we have a situation where people are not being respected and being attacked then I feel it is important to report the situation to the police. I have received death threats and reported this to the police. I hope the people who spat in my face and threatened to kill me will face a stiff sentence. I encourage people to stand with me to make sure these people face justice.
Question: Why did you approach these people?
Security: They were trying to put up a tent in a place that was not allowed. As soon as I said something, my life was threatened.
Response: It seems to me the people shouting about how they don’t like Occupy are the people who don’t contribute.
Response: I have been abused, had people call me names and I have had enough of it. It needs to stop.
Comment: I got strangled by the security guy for challenging the finance group. Why has nothing been done about that.
Response: That will be addressed.
Comment: You guys wind me up.
Response: The tranquillity team have been doing a great job keep people safe and looking after the cathedral.
Comment: They still wind me up.
Contribution: This is not a separate jurisdiction. If somebody acts violent towards me, I will call the police. It’s your responsibility to decide what to do.
Interruption: You should ask yourself why you’re hear. You don’t call the police.
Response: We are all friends here. I don’t go quickly to the police. We have tranquillity. We have a scheme first to communicate with people. If they don’t communicate, then if they still want to use violence, we go to second step. But not first to the police. Everybody should respect each other.
Comment: It’s all concepts of grown ups. We’ve gathered here for a common reason. It’s being lost. We have to learn how to live with everybody. The bells are too loud for children. There’s not much listening. Even when the girls were playing there wasn’t much listening.
[applause]
Facilitator: On that note, let’s move on to next point of agenda.
Question: Why are only some working groups on the website?
Response: There is a meeting tomorrow at 6pm.
Legal update: I came to Occupy for politics. I have met some of the most amazing people here. I met people who it’s hard to get on with. We have to take care of each other. If people are being violent it breeds fear. Not a society where women are scared to go to toilet during the night. I’m supposed to be in court on Monday. I’m afraid that’s not going to happen. I’m not sure what it is that I’m going to be spending three days defending. Do you want me to defend the right to get pissed and abuse each other; not to be reported to the police when if they committed these acts on the street they would be arrested. I’ve lost my flat. My struggle to spend time with my kids has been made more difficult. Sort your shit out people!
[applause]
Comment: Let’s have some silence for 2 mins.
[30 seconds silence]
Interruption: Why’s it silent?
Response: Shhh…
[90 seconds silence]
[applause]
Interrupter: I apologise for the interruption.
[Facilitator changes from Saskia to Phil.]
Facilitator: I am going to take questions on the last point that was raised.
Comment: I am here to reform family law system, which is very unfair to women and men. The issue is how we talk to people. Important to be mindful of what you say. Think about how what you say will make somebody feel. Not sure what transpired yesterday, but it is important to be mindful. … If we make decision we need to write it down. Probably repeating myself but I will keep saying these things over and over again. Let’s make this a transparent movement.
Facilitator: Thanks very much. How do people feel about moving on. Going to take some more points…
Comment: If Tammy goes we don’t have a case.
Comment: I have been coming every now and again. It’s been great to do this. Everybody should take a step back and think about why you’re here.
Comment: Just want to say something about Tammy. I stick by what Tammy. She is crying her eyes out.
Interruption: I don’t care, it’s her own ignorance.
[disruption]
Facilitator: I’m going to take one last point.
Comment: I’m a trained para-legal with 20 years high court experience. I came to help legal team. We do have a case. We have been very badly advised because they have served the document on the world and not on the Occupy (“persons unknown”). Honestly, City of London doesn’t have a case. Nobody should have made a statement because that would identify you.
[more disruption]
Facilitator: Because process has been abused so much, we are not going to continue with the general assembly. It is clear that nobody wants to have a general assembly. So the general assembly is over.
[general discussion]
Announcement: Mic check!
Response: MIC CHECK!
Announcement: The general assembly will continue shortly.
[Assembly gathers again. Facilitator changes back from Phil to Saskia.]
Facilitator: Explains consensus and hand signals.
Will read out initial statement. And then take points from people about what has been achieved. Then if people still want, we will break into groups to discuss what else we want to do.
Reads out initial statement:
INITIAL STATEMEN
This initial statement was collectively agreed by over 500 people on the steps of St Paul’s on 26 October 2011. Like all forms of direct democracy, the statement will always be a work in progress and is used as a basis for further discussion and debate.
The current system is unsustainable. It is undemocratic and unjust. We need alternatives; this is where we work towards them.
We are of all ethnicities, backgrounds, genders, generations, sexualities dis/abilities and faiths. We stand together with occupations all over the world.
We refuse to pay for the banks’ crisis.
We do not accept the cuts as either necessary or inevitable. We demand an end to global tax injustice and our democracy representing corporations instead of the people.
We want regulators to be genuinely independent of the industries they regulate.
We support the strike on the 30th November and the student action on the 9th November, and actions to defend our health services, welfare, education and employment, and to stop wars and arms dealing.
We want structural change towards authentic global equality. The world’s resources must go towards caring for people and the planet, not the military, corporate profits or the rich.
The present economic system pollutes land, sea and air, is causing massive loss of natural species and environments, and is accelerating humanity towards irreversible climate change. We call for a positive, sustainable economic system that benefits present and future generations. [1]
We stand in solidarity with the global oppressed and we call for an end to the actions of our government and others in causing this oppression.
This is what democracy looks like. Come and join us!
[applause]
Comment: How was statement created?
Facilitator: It was created by consensus on the first day. It was later changed by consensus to include an amendment from the environment group.
Comment: How do you want to achieve it?
Facilitator: That’s what we’re working out. What do people think we have achieved?
Response: We have created a lot of hope that change is possible.
Response: There are a lot of people who dislike what is happening, and we have brought it into the public eye. We keep people thinking about these issues.
Response: Have brought a lot of hope to people who are asking “what can I do” – you can come and join Occupy and help work it out.
Response: Talking about politics and economics was erudite thing, now have general members of the public wandering in joining is the discussion. That’s probably the best thing we’ve done.
Response: We are learning how to tolerate each other, how to communicate with each other, how to question current system. Are going to make a solution for all the major problems. We don’t leave it to parliament, politicians. We are questioning the system, directly by the people. We respect all views and good idea to be open for all ideas, and make it deeper and deeper and really change the system.
Response: Nothing more incredible to be debating all the issues with people you wouldn’t meet. The personal issues are taking away all the good that comes from debating the issues. Probably not best environment to be sleeping, not staying here but imagine it wouldn’t be very pleasant. Hope the people here can work through these issues. I know it’s difficult, me and my wife have arguments. But hope you can resolve these issues and then resolve the bigger issues.
Response: Has exposed all the corruption in the city etc. I feel privileged to be here.
Response: We are asking questions. The strength is our plurality. We are fighting for the same thing. Bringing divided groups together. Need to be careful to keep the diversity, so we represent the 99% (if that’s what we want to do).
Response: I have been with library. It is a good model. Free food, free tea and coffee. It’s good to keep it open. We can apply it to everything, like laptops. When we achieve that [trails off].
Response: One thing that hasn’t come out: people who have found a community, who will accept them. Stories that have brought tears to my eyes.
Response: We are relearning to live as communities. We have been atomised by individualistic society. We are told to be selfish, and are trying to learn what it means to live as a community.
[applause]
Facilitator: Would like to add, it’s difficult to see when you’re inside the camp. There is an incredible amount of discussion out there, online, etc. One thing that is empowering is that we are supporting each other. The problems we are having are the problems of our society. If you look at the broadcasts, Occupy is framing the debates. We have changed the debate.
Response: Very honoured and privileged to sit down with beautiful people who are standing up for issues that are affecting normal people.
Response: Why we were arguing amongst ourselves, there was a beautiful full moon with a double rainbow, and the masons were having a dinner up the road.
Facilitator: Anybody else?
Response: There are lots of issues: some have been addressed by political and social hierarchy and they would not be addressed if we had.
Response: We have been brave enough to show that we don’t have all the answers.
Response: I’ve been here for two weeks, and I’m getting annoyed with people who don’t contribute to any of the working groups.
Facilitator: We’ve had that conversation earlier.
Response: Some people do have some answers, and it’s been good to get these people together. People are starting to have conversations that they wouldn’t have had. We are getting to the answers. We have only been here 8 weeks. Most political parties have been around for ages. Give us some time.
Facilitator: There are complex issues and we are working together on them. Do you have a point sister?
Response: When I came I volunteered in the Info tent, there are so many people who are extremely supportive. It’s really the struggle of the 99% here.
Facilitator: My mum and dad have said there is overwhelming support. The vicar enjoyed receiving a copy of the Occupied Time.
Would you like to break into small groups? Temperature check… Okay.
[discussion groups]
Facilitator: Let’s feedback…
Group 1: We talked about the immediate issue: trying to find out what’s going happen; have a back up plan if court case doesn’t go to plan. Overall aim to have tent city stay here, to have a presence so people can come a debate in a civilised manner, if court say people can’t camp here. Want to keep presence here, so we feel there is still a movement. That’s the main thing. Beyond that, keeping transparency and communication between people. There were solutions in other groups, I overheard bits, would be interested to listen to them…
Group 2: Have done good things. Lots of people feel very safe here. Do you feel safe here? Yeah, some of you. Do all of you feel safe all the time? We have to address the time when people don’t feel safe. There are some who are vulnerable. We could do that in a couple of ways. We could work on the sexism angle. You like that? We came up with a few idea. People could come together to discuss their roles from a gender perspective. Another idea, we could swap gender roles. You’d like to see me in a dress right? We would have an understand of what it means to be the other person. The other thing was discrimination in general. We didn’t know what to do about that. But we could get together and talk about it. The general assembly must be a moral and ethical hub for the whole thing. That’s probably why we get back people trying to destroy it. If people respect the process then things will work. Propose a discrimination working group.
Facilitator: You might want to call it an anti-discrimination working group?
Group 2 Continues: Well that seems a bit negative, but we can work on the name. Is there any enthusiasm for that? [yes] That’s all from our group.
Direct point: A lot of people who are abusive are not here. I was called a “chink” but I am Vietnamese. Had to go out of my tent….
Facilitator: Thanks for your point. Let’s carry on with the feedback.
Group 3: One of the aims is to achieve and win our aims. To set ourselves reasonable goals, things we know we can achieve. Really nice aim from our group: plant fruit and vegetable plants. Make better records, how to preserve conversations, how we can disseminate. We win a lot by sharing our experiences. Another aim is to practice what we preach. To look at collaborators and partners, to build links and relations to work with existing groups. That would be very valuable. Another: local general assemblies, create template so other people can do it. Also: to Occupy people into seats of power – why can’t we have people standing for Major? Also: to looks at empty spaces for workers, to make a report about empty buildings and make something meaningful and useful.
Facilitator: Are there any others? No. The hour is getting late. Thanks for coming back to continue this general assembly.
Finally, I have a sad announcement. Somebody is looking Eileen Glass, she lives in Birmingham, 50s, wears long fake-fur coat, she has gone missing. We have a mobile number for her daughter.
Comment: I know something about this…
Facilitator: Great, that’s us looking after each other. Any shoutouts?
Shoutout: Woman’s meeting Thursday 5.30-7pm. Not to be separatist but discuss things.
Shoutout (Shelter): Anybody doesn’t have a place? No. Great! We are doing our job! We had a lot of tents blowing away in the wind. Are going to work through camp fixing things up. Please help us at 10.30am tomorrow. There is another weather warning for Thursday. Recommend you secure your tent to the pallet. Not recommending connecting tents to other tents.
Shoutout: There are some roadworks just down the road. There are some big rocks. We can use them to hold down the tents whilst we wait for better materials
[discussion about securing tents...]
Facilitator: Anybody willing to go help collect cardboard? Yes, one, two, three, four. Great!
Comment: Somebody don’t close their tent, and when it rains everything gets wet.
Response: People need to close their tents.
Facilitator: Okay, brothers and sisters. Thanks for your solidarity. Occupy everywhere!
Ends: 10.03pm


Contact your Fat Councillor with interesting facts and tip offs here

13 Dec 2011

GA Minutes – 7pm Monday 12th December 2011


GA Minutes – 7pm Monday 12th 13th December 2011

General Assembly 12.12.11
7pm
Facilitator: Sasquia
Minutes: Phil
Welcome:
Ad Hoc today due to no process today at 5pm
Agenda
Working Group Feedback,
Announcement from Glasgow
Discussion on Statement of Autonomy
Shout outs

Consensus explained
Announcements and working group feedback:
-There is a Gale coming in. Tonight we need to check over tent lines.
-It is the 12th of December – applause each other for been here this long! We are here for almost as long as Parliament square. But there has been no victory. We have no message. We have not engaged the public.
-[Facilitator]Our papers were submitted to court today. Tammy is representing us. We could be evicted in a week. Consider our time here as value. Also remember the 15th of December – day of occupies.
-[Tammy] We could be evicted from here. IT is unlikely but possible. We need to discuss what to do next with Occupy.
-[Facilitator] This should be a topic in the GA and between each other on site. I will make sure this topic makes it to the GA via Process.
-Today there has been actions on the west coast of America where Occupy Oakland have been shutting down ports.
[Facilitator] The action was to shut down all ports on the west coast.
-[Hassan] I attended a demo with Congolese on their recent election outside the BBC. More than 5 million Congolese have died in the last decade of conflict. They have asked for support on a demo at Great Portland street on Wednesday mid day at the Democratic Republic of Congo Embassy.
-Women’s event in the Yurt 5:30-7pm on Thursday for women.
-Today is the anniversary of Greenham Common – applause
-Interim-Finance: Tomorrows lunch time GA is Budget day!
-[Facilitator] Finance have done a great job – we should support them
-Welfare: 4pm-8pm tent is open for talk 1on1 for those who need it.
-EEE: Big Green Day, Sunday 10am to 10pm, speakers, workshops, bands, in yurt, TCU and steps of Saint Paul’s
-Outreach: New flyers coming finally (same format, new logo), raised in last GA on outreach that info tent did not have a book to leave contact details – this has been remedied. We are liaising with Edinburgh to facilitate the National Occupy Meet-up this coming weekend.
-[Facilitator] Occupy Totness started last weekend. Encourage others to get up there. Occupy Plymouth have occupied a dis-used jobcentre. Applause

Statement of Autonomy
[Facilitator] Do we want consensus on this tonight after discussion?
-a few hands waved in support (5%)
Reads statement aloud.

[Ryan] from Glasgow produces an alternative statement and reads it allowed.
Applause
[several tents are flying about and TCU nearly takes off!]
[Facilitator] GA suspended as hurricane is hitting – Can everyone please go outside and assist in securing the site.

GA resumes.
[Facilitator] I would like to invite Ryan to discuss his statement
[John] I would prefer if we stuck to the autonomy statement as the Glasgow statement reads more like a constitution.
[Ryan] I wrote it and have put a lot of time into it. It is being floated across Europe.
[Facilitator] We can take it and feed it into the process WG to become part of discussion at a later date.
[Chris] I am concerned with the mention to ‘anonymity’ in the Glasgow statement.
[Tammy] Perhaps it can be discussed and worked on by the Media WG
[John] Perhaps it can be posted on the forum for further discussion
[Facilitator] Lets return to the statement. The previous temp check showed that people are not in serious disagreement with it.
[person] does this apply to all occupies? London occupies or just Saint Paul’s
[Facilitator]can anyone clarify whom this statement covers?
[John] LSX does not apply as a term any more. It is ‘Occupy London’ as we are no longer outside the stock exchange. This would include Finsbury square
[Chris] I thought each site was completely autonomous.
[Ruth] There should be a limit to people making statements on the website as ‘occupy london’. We should state that we do not agree to people making statements on behalf of Occupy London when it has not been agreed in a GA.
[John] We should also not allow Lawyers to speak on our behalf.
[person] Legal technicality, how can this document be for the whole of London Occupy? We are specifically Saint Paul’s square. We should be ‘Occupy City of London’ as this has certain legal implications which I can’t go into.
[Facilitator] I understand that this is ‘occupy lsx’ and this site is separate to occupy Finsbury and BofI.
[John] This is not the case as the other sites do take funds. Documents passed here apply to anyone who uses the lsx name.
[Facilitator] Do we have the authority to do this?
[Ruth] Yes, in the same way as Finsbury could issue a statement on behalf of Occupy London.
[Tammy] I feel it is wrong to move ahead with this statement by way of consensus without having the other sites present.
[Facilitator] We will have the discussion now but not look for consensus. We can do that on the Wednesday GA.
[Ruth] Then it should be this Wednesday as this topic has been put off for too long.
[Facilitator] OK, we will do a temp check after discussion OR look for consensus just for this camp. Occupy London is a term that applies to all of us.
[John] The idea of autonomous sites is misunderstood. Politically we are one site.
[person] I was at BofI and one of their leaders said BofI is nothing to do with Occupy.
[Ryan] We are all going through an individual process and camp process. We are all different. Our differences make us strong.
[Ruth] What if we can not get this passed on Wednesday? Perhaps we should get consensus at Saint Paul’s and then work towards consensus London-wide.
[Cyril] Lets try and make it happen on Wednesday and then get a Thursday slot if we do not have consensus.
[Facilitator] there are two camps emerging
[Tammy] Which working group did this come from?
[Ryan] Should we not stand in solidarity with each other. Do it on Wednesday so that we all stand together.
[Hassan] It is a good statement. It needs to be more accessible. Good points include no leaders, no organizations dominating us, we are not copying other movements, we are autonomous.
[John] BofI are fighting an eviction. One of the cases is that they are a protest. Their defence is that they are not a protest – this is for the legal process only. But it does confuse people.
[Ruth] What is the urgency? A lot of us have been horrified but some of the statements that have come out of Occupy.
[Tammy] can you give us an example?
[Ruth] That Hector Sants was thanked for meeting with us. He is responsible for killing.
[Tammy] I thought we agreed to distance occupy from the talks?
[Ruth] Well, it did not happen, it is urgent to stop this kind of thing happening without bringing it to a GA. Another example is the Corporation of London Demands that were leaked to the media, denied he leaked them to the GA then admitted that he had indeed leaked. Despite the GA requesting the media team to make a correction the media team not only refused the GA but are now working with the individual who made the leak.
[Cyril] Can the person who made the statement get more copies for next time.
[Facilitator] I shall take amendments now then post up the revised version on line for discussion Wednesday.
[John] We could ask the media team + website not to produce any statements until this statement has been discussed. As things are now – we could start our own media team and issue our own press releases. We need this statement for our protection.
[person] Is it possible for a statement to be authentic? Can three people after the GA sign any statement to be released anywhere in the world.
[Facilitator] I do not understand?
[person] For authenticity and transparency can a document be signed by occupy.
[Facilitator] The minutes are the record of documents
[Ryan] we must avoid division
[Ruth] The legal case is important to this. We held the team accountable in negotiations with the Corporation of London. That tradition has weakened. We have to get control over statements issued by groups in case a statement is issued regarding our future at Saint Paul’s without our consent.
[Facilitator] Shall we work through this and look for a temp check?
[Ruth] And if it is not passed on Wednesday then our temp check tonight should be respected and govern behaviour.
[person] It was advertised for tonight very well and everyone knew about it.
[John] I would agree to this if the media team agree to a freeze on issuing statements.
[Cyril] Lets get the meeting for Wednesday well advertised. I agree with John.
[Ryan] We need to stand together.
[Chris] I have just come back in from having my life threatened just now! There are some individuals stealing on site right now and when I tried to deal with it I received no help.
[Tammy] Discussed and agreed that if situation like this arose, not to leave two or three ppl to deal with it but more ppl should go and support them.
[Man] I know them, I can bring the ppl down here and we can talk to them.
[Saskia] People who nick things or are rude are not welcome, if they don’t abide by the safer space policy we ask them to leave, this has been agreed by GA after GA.
Second person threatened.
Call the police and get a video of it.
GA suspended for five minutes to deal with situation.
Resumed
[Saskia] proposing to get in touch w RMT asap to take up a role in security here at St Paul’s, they have already offered.
[Ruth] have a brainstorming re what we can do to defend ourselves ie walk ppl off site. Discuss & practise scenarios, training in group self defense
Phil how to deal w ppl fr camp who stand with the troublemakers against the ppl trying to intervene, how do we deal w that?
Saskia so proposal is to contact rmt immediately.
Cyril some ppl quite disruptive, started w tranquility, now called security, getting more aggresive, on both sides, can I tbe tranquillity as much as possible.
Hassan we look after ourselves.
Saskia tranquillity was threatening to quit.
Tammy we’ve been trying to deal with ourselves but not working, has had enough as a female. Don’t want to go to the toilet at night. Fighting. Anyone who doesn’t think we need security should step up and be security.
Glasgow man some are infiltrators
John where does tranquillity come from? Using methodology of climate camp.
Max can someone guard info tent
[Obi] We do not get enough volunteers for tranquillity. It does not work.
[Cyril] We could have a tranquillity team with a security team.
[Max] TUC were invited in. I spoke to them. It has been discussed in GA’s before. Unions are prepared to offer night time support to work alongside the tranquillity. We had a visit from the local TUC rep and it went well.
[Facilitator] How long till we can get them here.
[Max] I can liaise with the TUC and get a response very quickly.
[Tammy] What if they want to take over the camp? Can we get an open meeting to talk with them?
[Max] Yes, it must be an open process. They are only helping. There must be ground rules for them to operate under.
[Ryan] In America they had the love police and workshops which stopped the problems from arising. The Unions could come and do teach ins.
[person from Los Angeles Occupy] If you police site and eject people from the camp then it may have issues regarding public space. Removing people that are already camped here could create further conflict.
[Ruth] RMT should come and talk to the GA and tranquillity. Out T team are volunteers that have put themselves on the line. Our tranquillity team did deny that a rape took place.
[Chris] I am very glad to hear that we may get assistance from the Unions. If the Police get involved they will remove the person from site and if charged they will be bailed with conditions not to return here.
[Cyril] We must make the tranquillity end peaceful and diffuse situations instead of using security every time.
[Facilitator] do we have consensus?
[Facilitator] The proposal is for the unions to assist/join our tranquillity team.
[Andy] Will the TUC be here as TUC or as Occupy?
[Max] 8 people per watch – 4 TUC and 4 tranquillity. Rules: they are part of tranquillity – occupy. They will be using de-escalation techniques. They will not be here AS occupy but as external volunteers.
[Hassan] I do not want to block this but I think it is good idea to have more volunteers. I will volunteer. Problem is that we have to be up all night. Can we split the shift.
[Facilitator] Do we have consensus?
[Cyril] Can we invite them first?
[Facilitator] We will invite them to a GA first. If we are happy we will look for consensus again.
[person] Can we interview them first
[Facilitator] we have never interviewed eachother that’s redundant
[Andy] I could get hells angels here. I do not like outside support helping us. We are Occupy. We do not have other movements coming in and working their own agendas.
[Facilitator] They would be joining the tranquillity team not replacing them.
[Andy] I will retract my objection
[Facilitator] I propose that we agree that RMT volunteers may join our tranquillity team. Max will broker the meeting as soon as possible. Then they will attend the GA immediately thereafter to meet the site. Then we test for consensus. If we are happy they will operate on a 50/50 basis with tranquility. They will exchange skills in peaceful de-escalation.
[Facilitator] We have consensus. Max will invite them to the GA.
[Andy] Why are these RMT members not already here as occupy? Why do they have to come as a police force.
[person] The GA today was interrupted. We can work with any organization that will work with us. We do not exclude people SO LONG AS they comply with our model. They must and will abide by our rules.
[Tammy] They are not coming to take over. They will learn from us at our GA about what we want from them and how we work. If we do not like them or they feel they can not work here then it ends.
[Caroline] My only concern would be coopting.
[Max] Yes, as part of the agreement and it is in writing – cooperation does not mean co-opting.
[Facilitator] Instead of saying occupy lsx the document (autonomy statement) should say occupy London.
[Ruth] I agree but on Wednesday, and afterwards, it should be clear that we expect that other WG’s should respect this document even if it does not have consensus.
[Facilitator] Should we do a temp check on this document?
(Facilitator reads out the statement)
Temp check please? It is overwhelmingly positive. Ruth would like a proviso that makes it binding.
[Ruth] No, I would like an agreement that it is brought to a GA on Wednesday, that all sites get sufficient copies in advance, if we can not discuss it on Wednesday then we expect those speaking on behalf of occupy London to consider it when they speak.
[person] The statement does not explain what happens if we…
[facilitator] sorry but that is more part of the GA discussion next time. Proposal is that it gets brought up on Wednesday. It can also be brought up on Thursday.
(overwhelming support)
[John] I want it to be top of the agenda on Wednesday
[Andy] Thank the facilitator.
[Facilitator] So has everyone else.
APPLAUSE
[John] I was assaulted in the recent incident, can I have moral support to go to the Police station?
(overwhelming hands raised in support)

SHOUTOUTS
[Hassan] The Congolese really need our support on Wednesday.
[Tammy] We need to do something for Occupy as well. Can we plan a DA event.


Contact your Fat Councillor with interesting facts and tip offs here

Ratings and Recommendations by outbrain

More stuff from your Fat Councillor

Related Posts with Thumbnails